Royal author Tom Bower has once again caused a stir by reporting a shocking Divorce Clause Revealed in the prenuptial agreement between Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. According to Bower, this particular clause may have significant consequences for the Duke of Sussex, who reportedly signed without fully understanding its implications.
The Divorce Clause Revealed in Meghan and Harry's prenup is said to affect their joint assets, intellectual property rights, and brand ownership. Tom Bower explains that the amendment, added in 2020, favors Meghan’s control over shared ventures such as Archwell, Netflix contracts, and other business enterprises.
This Divorce Clause Revealed highlights how Meghan’s legal strategy mirrors her first divorce from Trevor Engelson, where she structured finances to protect her independence. Sources reveal that all trademarks, deals, and ventures created after 2022 were filed solely under her name, ensuring maximum protection.
California law treats property earned during marriage as community property. The Divorce Clause Revealed in Meghan’s prenup amendment goes further, giving her primary control over revenue streams and content ownership. Legal experts say this makes Harry’s position far weaker than most expected.
Bower notes that the clause doesn’t just cover finances—it also includes provisions for media control, public appearances, and brand management. Essentially, the Divorce Clause Revealed gives Meghan leverage over the narrative and the assets in the event of a split, while Harry is left in a secondary position.
The return of PR firm Sunshine Sachs in January 2026, according to Bower, was not coincidental. The firm specializes in high-profile crisis management. This move, combined with the Divorce Clause Revealed, suggests a carefully planned strategy to secure Meghan’s brand and legal independence.
Since 2022, Meghan has established several independent ventures, trademarks, and contracts, all filed under her name alone. The Divorce Clause Revealed in her prenup amendment complements these moves, ensuring that even if a formal separation occurs, she maintains full control over assets and intellectual property. Harry, on the other hand, could face restrictions in monetizing his royal story or media deals.
If the Divorce Clause Revealed is enforced, Prince Harry risks losing majority control of Archwell, revenue from joint projects, and possibly even influence over property titles such as the Montecito mansion. California family law may favor Meghan as the primary caregiver, further complicating custody arrangements. Bower emphasizes that Harry signed the amendment without realizing the full implications.
According to Bower, every step Meghan has taken—from re-engaging Sunshine Sachs to filing solo trademarks—demonstrates careful planning. The Divorce Clause Revealed is a cornerstone of this strategy, ensuring her independence and control over both public perception and financial outcomes. Harry appears to be realizing the full impact of this legal trap only recently.
The Divorce Clause Revealed in Meghan Markle’s prenup highlights a sophisticated approach to asset protection and media control. Whether it was planned from the beginning or executed over time, this clause places Meghan in a position of significant leverage. For Prince Harry, understanding this clause’s full impact is critical as the couple navigates legal and financial complexities. The Sussexes’ situation continues to unfold, with fans and legal experts closely watching every move.
