During the discussion, Morgan hosted historian Tessa Dunlop, and the conversation quickly turned tense when they debated whether Prince Harry and Meghan Markle should lose their royal titles.
Dunlop argued that it is not possible to “un-royal” Harry, which prompted Morgan to sharply respond by referencing Prince Andrew’s situation, questioning whether Andrew had effectively been “un-royaled.”
Her reaction was immediate, as she accused Morgan of making an uncomfortable comparison between Harry and Andrew, suggesting the two should not be placed in the same category. She also criticized his tone during the exchange, describing it as inappropriate and overly harsh.
Morgan, however, pushed back and clarified that while he sees clear differences in severity between the cases, he considers Prince Andrew’s actions significantly more serious than anything Harry and Meghan have been accused of. He referred to Andrew’s association with Jeffrey Epstein, allegations of dishonesty, and his refusal to testify under oath as key reasons for his view.
Despite this, Morgan maintained his broader argument that members of the royal family who damage the reputation of the monarchy should face consequences, including the possible removal of their titles. He pointed to the precedent set in Andrew’s case as justification for that position.
Dunlop disagreed, arguing that public opinion is often shaped by the loudest voices rather than balanced judgment. She also defended the Sussexes, saying their decision to step back from royal duties reflected independence and personal growth. She highlighted Meghan’s more informal approach to her public identity, noting instances where she preferred being called “Meg” rather than using her royal title.
The exchange became increasingly heated as Morgan pushed back strongly, dismissing the emphasis on titles and expressing frustration with what he saw as unnecessary formality surrounding Meghan’s royal status.
