Fresh into the new year, Prince Harry is once again voicing concerns about his security situation. Honestly, it feels like déjà vu. The man who chose to step away from royal duties, move to California, and publicly criticize his family is now upset that King Charles isn’t prioritizing his calls about security.
This is the same Harry who gave a bombshell interview with Oprah, aired private grievances in a tell-all memoir, and threw his family under the bus repeatedly. And now he’s shocked—shocked!—that his father isn’t picking up the phone. Come on, Harry, read the room.
Sources "close to Harry" (we all know what that means) claim he’s reluctant to visit the UK with his family unless their safety is assured. But let’s not forget that Harry has managed to make quick trips to the UK for events like the Platinum Jubilee and his father’s coronation when it suited him. Funny how security concerns seem to align with media cycles, isn’t it?
And then there’s the narrative of their idyllic life in Montecito. According to their PR, it’s a life filled with joy, community, and fulfillment. But local reports paint a different picture. Remember when a journalist revealed that no one in Montecito ever actually sees them? Yet, they’re being sold as these active community members. It’s hard to reconcile these conflicting stories.
Let’s not forget the conveniently timed photo ops, like their brief 20-minute visit to wildfire victims. Because nothing screams “I care” like a lightning-fast stop just long enough for a photo.
And speaking of timing, doesn’t it feel like Harry’s security concerns always resurface whenever Meghan has a project to promote? Take her delayed cooking show as an example. First, it’s announced with much fanfare; then, it’s postponed. The whole situation gives off “I want attention, but not the criticism” vibes.
A recurring theme in Harry and Meghan’s grievances is their children. Harry often claims that safe visits are necessary so his kids can know their "home country." But these are the same people who criticized the British press and the monarchy relentlessly. Now, they suddenly want their children to experience all of that? The contradictions are glaring.
Let’s be real: this isn’t about the children. It’s about wanting the perks of royal life without any of the responsibilities. Meanwhile, William and Catherine are quietly doing the work—raising their children with an understanding of their roles, representing the monarchy with dignity, and avoiding the media circus.
What’s truly frustrating is Harry’s lack of self-awareness. He chose to step away from royal duties. He chose to move to America. He chose to air his grievances publicly. Yet, he seems surprised by the consequences of those choices. It’s like quitting your job, badmouthing your boss online, and then wondering why you weren’t invited to the company party.
King Charles has shown remarkable restraint despite Harry’s constant provocations. He’s leading the monarchy through a period of modernization, managing his health, and embracing his duties. He doesn’t have the bandwidth for Harry’s ongoing demands for security—especially when Harry has done little to repair the relationship.
What’s saddest about this saga is the damage Harry is doing to his own legacy. He was once a beloved royal, admired for his charity work and relatability. Now, he’s become a figure of constant grievance.
And Meghan? Her transformation from a little-known actress to someone who seems to think she’s royalty in her own right is nothing short of fascinating. The constant need for attention and the carefully crafted PR stunts are exhausting to watch.
Meanwhile, the working royals—William, Catherine, Princess Anne—are quietly fulfilling their duties with grace and dignity. They’re not complaining to the press or staging photo ops. They’re doing the work.
This whole security saga feels like a never-ending loop. Whenever Harry and Meghan need media attention, it’s their go-to storyline. It’s hard not to feel secondhand embarrassment watching them squander their platform and privileges.
